CHANGES IN ATMOSPHERIC AIR POLLUTION AND FUEL COMBUSTION EFFICIENCY IN UKRAINIAN CITIES DUE TO MILITARY ACTIONS

Nadtochii L.
Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine and National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3038-5960

Rybchynska V.
Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine and National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5343-8723

Savenets M.
Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine and National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9429-6209

DOI: http://doi.org/10.15407/Meteorology2023.04.004

Keywords: nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, Sentinel-5P, plume, background content

Abstract

The full-scale russian invasion of Ukraine significantly changed atmospheric air pollution in Ukrainian cities. Most changes can be identified using only remote sensing data due to its spatial coverage. In the presented paper, we perform the analysis of war impacts on nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and carbon monoxide (CO) spatial distribution derived from the TROPOsphericMOnitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) of the Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5P) satellite data for the period of January 2021 – May 2023. Based on their content in polluted plumes over the city and in the background, the parameter dNO2/dСО for burning efficiency assessment was calculated and processed. The overall decrease in NO2 and CO content was detected in the cities, reaching 6-34% and 9-17%, respectively. In comparison to background content, the NO2 drop in cities was more significant. At the same time, CO decreased by 2-3% more in the background than over the cities (except Mariupol, where Azovstal was totally destroyed). Since the full-scale hostilities have started, total NO2 content began redistributing seasonally and its summer maxima started to appear in the majority of cities. Starting from the period of regular drone and missile attacks on energy infrastructure, background NO2 significantly decreased, showing a regional response. CO total content has changed mostly homogeneously over the entire studied domain. There were no seasonal shifts or dependencies during the period of war. Using the four parameters mentioned, we estimated burning efficiency changes based on the dNO2/dСО parameter. It allowed us to detect possible changes in fuel use. Overall, dNO2/dСО decreased by 11-46% which indirectly proved the increase in solid or “dirty” fuel use and less gas consumption. Burning efficiency dropped immediately after the full-scale invasion started, becoming more sensitive to pollutants content in the plume. The consideration of the researched parameters is important for making new atmospheric air quality management plans in cities, rebuilding damaged infrastructure, and creating emission inventories during the wartime.

References

1. Apituley, A., Pedergnana, M., Sneep M., et al. (2022). Sentinel-5 precursor/TROPOMI Level 2 Product User Manual Carbon Monoxide. Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI): The Netherlands.

2. Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Military Activities During the Yugoslavia Conflict. Preliminary Findings. (1999). The Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe.

3. Austin, J. E. ,& Bruch, C.E (Eds.). (2000). The Environmental Consequences of War: Legal, Economic and Scientific Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.

4. Borsdorff, T., García Reynoso, A., Maldonado, G., Mar-Morales, B., Stremme, W., Grutter, M., & Landgraf, J. (2020). Monitoring CO emissions of the metropolis Mexico City using TROPOMI CO observations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(24), 15761–15774. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15761-2020

5. Du, Z., Sarofim, A. F., Longwell, J. P., &Tognotti, L. (1991). The CO/CO2 Ratio in the Products of the Carbon-Oxygen Reaction. In Fundamental Issues in Control of Carbon Gasification Reactivity (pp. 91–106). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3310-4_5

6. Eskes, H., van Geffen, J., Boersma, F., et al. (2022). Sentinel-5 precursor/TROPOMI Level 2 Product User Manual Nitrogendioxide. Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI): The Netherlands.

7. Griffin, D., McLinden, C. A., Dammers, E., Adams, C., Stockwell, C. E., Warneke, C., Bourgeois, I., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Zarzana, K. J., Rowe, J. P., Volkamer, R., Knote, C., Kille, N., Koenig, T. K., Lee, C. F., Rollins, D., Rickly, P. S., Chen, J., … Makar, P. (2021). Biomass burning nitrogen dioxide emissions derived from space with TROPOMI: methodology and validation. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 14(12), 7929–7957. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7929-2021

8. Goldberg, D. L., Lu, Z., Oda, T., Lamsal, L. N., Liu, F., Griffin, D., McLinden, C. A., Krotkov, N. A., Duncan, B. N., & Streets, D. G. (2019). Exploiting OMI NO2 satellite observations to infer fossil-fuel CO2 emissions from U.S. megacities. Science of The Total Environment, 695, 133805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133805

9. Ialongo, I., Bun, R., Hakkarainen, J., Virta, H., & Oda, T. (2023). Satellites capture socioeconomic disruptions during the 2022 full-scale war in Ukraine. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 14954. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42118-w

10. Lama, S., Houweling, S., Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H., Aben, I., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Krol, M. C., Dolman, H., Borsdorff, T., &Lorente, A. (2020). Quantifying burning efficiency in megacities using the NO 2 ∕CO ratio from the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(17), 10295–10310. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10295-2020

11. Lama, S., Houweling, S., Boersma, K. F., Aben, I., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., &Krol, M. C. (2022). Estimation of OH in urban plumes using TROPOMI-inferred NO2/CO. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22(24), 16053–16071. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-16053-2022

12. OESD (2022). Environmental impacts of the war in Ukraine and prospects for a green reconstruction. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/ukraine-hub/policy-responses/environmental-impacts-of-the-war-in-ukraine-and-prospects-for-a-green-reconstruction-9e86d691/ (Accessed: 28.08.2023)

13. Payne, C. R. ,& Sand, P.H (Eds.). (2011). Gulf War Reparations and the UN Compensation Commission. Environmental Liability. Oxford University Press.

14. Sadiq, M., &McCain, C. (Eds.). (1993). The Gulf War Aftermath: An Environment Tradegy. Springer Netherlands.

15. Sasmoko, Imran, M., Khan, S., Khan, H. ur R., Jambari, H., Musah, M. B., & Zaman, K. (2023). War psychology: The global carbon emissions impact of the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1065301

16. Savenets, M., Osadchyi, V., Komisar, K., Zhemera, N., &Oreshchenko, A. (2023). Remotely visible impacts on air quality after a year-round full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 14(11), 101912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2023.101912

17. Saw, G. K., Dey, S., Kaushal, H., & Lal, K. (2021). Tracking NO2 emission from thermal power plants in North India using TROPOMI data. Atmospheric Environment, 259, 118514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118514

18. Silva, S. J., Arellano, A. F., & Worden, H. M. (2013). Toward anthropogenic combustion emission constraints from space‐based analysis of urban CO2 /CO sensitivity. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(18), 4971–4976. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50954 

19. Solomon, N., Birhane, E., Gordon, C., Haile, M., Taheri, F., Azadi, H., &Scheffran, J. (2018). Environmental impacts and causes of conflict in the Horn of Africa: A review. Earth-Science Reviews, 177, 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.11.016

20. UNEP (2023). The toxic legacy of the Ukraine war. Retrieved fromhttps://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/toxic-legacy-ukraine-war (Accessed: 28.08.2023)

21. Wan, N., Xiong, X., Kluitenberg, G. J., Hutchinson, J. M. S., Aiken, R., Zhao, H., & Lin, X. (2023). Estimation of biomass burning emission of NO2 and CO from 2019–2020 Australia fires based on satellite observations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 23(1), 711–724. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-711-2023

22. WWF (2022). Assessing the environmental impacts of the war in Ukraine. Retrieved fromhttps://wwfcee.org/our-offices/ukraine/assessing-the-environmental-impacts-of-the-war-in-ukraine (Accessed: 28.08.2023)

23. Zalakeviciute, R., Mejia, D., Alvarez, H., Bermeo, X., Bonilla-Bedoya, S., Rybarczyk, Y., & Lamb, B. (2022). War Impact on Air Quality in Ukraine. Sustainability, 14(21), 13832. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113832

24. Zhang, C., Hu, Q., Su, W., Xing, C., & Liu, C. (2023). Satellite spectroscopy reveals the atmospheric consequences of the 2022 Russia-Ukraine war. Science of The Total Environment,869, 161759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161759

25. Osadchyi V., Oreshchenko A., Savenets M. (2023). Satellite monitoring of fires and air pollution. State Emergency Service of Ukraine, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, UkrGMI, https://doi.org/10.15407/uhmi.2023_1[in Ukrainian].

26. Rybchynska V.O., Savenets M.V. (2023). The use of satellite data of atmospheric air pollution to assess the effectiveness of combustion processes on the territory of Ukraine. Hydrology, hydrochemistry and hydroecology, 2(68), 43-55, https://doi.org/10.17721/2306-5680.2023.2.5[in Ukrainian].

About ׀ Editorial board ׀ Ethics ׀ For authors ׀ For reviewers ׀ Archive ׀ Contacts