CLIMATE EDUCATION FOR GREEN RECONSTRUCTION: CHALLENGES, METHODS AND PRACTICAL CASES

Stanislav Kukhtyk
Higher Education Institution “Academician Yuriy Bugay International Scientific and Technical University”
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2738-5866

Vira Balabukh
Ukrainian Research Hydrometeorological Institute of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine and the National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukrai
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3223-7531

DOI: http://doi.org/10.15407/Meteorology2025.08.081

Keywords: climate change; climate education; European Green Deal; sustainable development competencies; green recovery; climate change adaptation

Abstract

The development of climate education is a crucial factor in shaping the competencies required for implementing Ukraine's green reconstruction, adapting to climate change, and achieving climate neutrality. It is substantiated that, in the context of increasing climate risks and transformations in global climate policy, education plays a system-forming role in ensuring the climate resilience of society and the economy. It is demonstrated that solving these tasks necessitates the systematic integration of educational, scientific, and practical approaches to foster interdisciplinary knowledge and skills. The results of implementing summer schools and workshops within the framework of the UniCities and New European Bauhaus Academy projects, which tested educational formats based on the challenge-based learning methodology and the living labs concept, are presented. These formats provide a combination of learning, research, and practice, contributing to the development of competencies provided by the European GreenComp system: systems thinking, cooperation, innovation, and the ability to act. It is demonstrated that interdisciplinary educational practices centered on real-world cases of green reconstruction enhance the readiness of future specialists to develop and implement adaptive, nature-oriented solutions in local communities. It is noted that climate education acts as a catalyst for the implementation of adaptive and nature-oriented solutions at the local level, enhancing the effectiveness of climate services and management practices. It has been proven that the development of climate education should become a strategic priority in the post-war green transformation of Ukraine and in increasing the state's climate resilience. The scientific novelty of the study lies in identifying climate education as a strategic tool for post-war green transformation in Ukraine, which ensures synergy between science, education, culture, and the practice of sustainable development.

References

1. Bason, C., Conway, R., Hill, D., & Mazzucato, M. (2020). A new Bauhaus for a Green Deal. November. [Online] Available at: ucl. ac. uk/bartlett/public-purpose/sites/public-purpose/files/new_bauhaus_cb_rc_dh_mm_0. pdf [Accessed 06 November 2025]..

2. Bilbao-Goyoaga, A., Gonz?lez-Lasquibar, X.., Barrenechea-Ayesta, M., & Barandiaran-Gald?s, M. (2023). Sustainability and challenge-based learning in higher education. Journal of Management and Business Education, 6(Special), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2023.0029

3. Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U. and Cabrera Giraldez, M. (2022) GreenComp The European sustainability competence framework, Punie, Y. and Bacigalupo, M. editor(s), EUR 30955 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, https://doi.org/:10.2760/71066, JRC128040

4. European Commission. (2019, December 11). Communication on the European Green Deal. COM (2019) 640 final. https://commission.europa.eu/publications/communication-european-green-deal_en

5. Evans, J., Jones, R., Karvonen, A., Millard, L. and Wendler, J. (2015). Living Labs and Co-Production: University Campuses as Platforms for Sustainability Science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 16. 1-6.

6. H?ffken, J., Lazendic-Galloway, J. (2024). Engaging for the future: challenge-based learning and stakeholder partnerships in sustainability education. Sustain Earth Reviews 7, 20 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-024-00087-6

7. LEE, Hoesung, et al. IPCC, 2023: Climate change 2023: Synthesis report, summary for policymakers. Contribution of working groups i, II and III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [core writing team, h. Lee and j. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland

8. Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2017). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: a systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842

9. Vocasek, T. (2021). New EU strategy on adaptation to climate change.

10. Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6, 203–218

11. World Meteorological Organization. (2025, May 28). WMO Global Annual to Decadal Climate Update (2025–2029). https://wmo.int/publication-series/wmo-global-annual-decadal-climate-update-2025-2029

About ׀ Editorial board ׀ Ethics ׀ For authors ׀ For reviewers ׀ Archive ׀ Contacts