| UKRAINIAN HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE STATE EMERGENCY SERVICE OF UKRAINE AND THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF UKRAINE | Blank in the format .doc |
Journal «Meteorology. Hydrology. Environmental monitoring»
REVIEW – RECOMMENDATION FOR THE MANUSCRIPT
Title of the Manuscript_______________________________________________________________________________________
General characteristics of the Manuscript: The work is [experimental, theoretical, review, short communication, description of a new methodology] (please underline).Additional Description ((optional)):_____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The Manuscript profile: corresponds (does not correspond) to the topic of the journal (must be underlined).
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Does the summary reflect the content of the Manuscript? : Yes, No
Does the Introduction prove the relevance of the development (Yes, No), state its purpose (Yes, No), clearly formulate the problem (Yes, No), and provide a sufficient review of previous developments on the topic of the article (Yes, No)? Additional comments are possible:_____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Style of Presentation: Clear, overly declarative (lacks support from own experiments or calculations), the work is structured (unstructured), requires shortening , reworking, contains unjustified repetitions, formulas, figures, it is advisable to shorten (or supplement) the reference list, improve the technical formatting of the text, figures, too many grammatical errors (typos) (please underline).
Scientific Content: The material is original; it is of scientific interest, previously published in full, partially; it contains new experimental data, theoretical, methodological innovations;
scientific results are substantiated (not substantiated), does not contain significantly new scientific results; it includes erroneous (ambiguous) statements, questionable data, statistically or experimentally
unsubstantiated (please underline). Possible additions:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Conclusions: specific, non-specific, declarative, corresponds to, partially corresponds to, do not correspond at all to the content of the article, discloses (do not discloses) the scientific novelty of the article; can be shortened, should be expanded, indicates (do not indicates) prospects for further research (please underline).
Does the Manuscript has practical significance: yes, no, insignificant, the work is of fundamental scientific nature (please underline).
Reviewer's Comments and Recommendations: _________________________________________________________________
If more detailed comments are necessary, the reviewer may provide them on a separate page.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Conclusion on the Manuscript: it is recommended for publication in the journal «Meteorology. Hydrology. Environmental monitoring»; it is recommended with revisions; it may be published after significant reduction to the size of a short communication; publication should be considered after revision; article is not recommended for publication (please underline).
Information about the Reviewer:
Name ____________________________________________________________________________Position, Academic Degree: ___________________________________________________________
Phone ________________________________________
Date _________________________________________
Signature _____________________________________
